Benchmarks

How Addis Scribe measures up
on Hausa speech.

Addis Scribe now transcribes Hausa, live and from uploads. We compared it with Google Gemini Flash and Google Chirp 3 on three public test sets, with the same scorer for every system. Each of the three comes out ahead on one of the sets, and this page shows where.

WAXAL word error rate, live
22.5%
Common Voice, live
17.3%
FLEURS, live
24.2%
Released
2 November 2026
Summary

Three test sets, three different pictures

On WAXAL, Addis Scribe is about level with Google Gemini Flash. On FLEURS, Google Chirp 3 is ahead. On Common Voice, Addis Scribe has fewer errors than both Google systems.

WAXAL

About level with Gemini on WAXAL

On all 197 clips of the WAXAL Hausa test split, Addis Scribe records 22.5% WER live (1.12 s chunks), 22.8% with 0.32 s chunks and 23.4% as an upload. Google Gemini Flash records 22.2% given the whole clip, and Google Chirp 3 records 60.9% as a batch request.

Read the full accuracy tables
FLEURS and Common Voice

Behind Chirp on FLEURS, ahead on Common Voice

On FLEURS Hausa, Google Chirp 3 (19.5%) is ahead of Addis Scribe (24.2%), and Gemini Flash records 26.3%. On Common Voice Hausa, Addis Scribe records 17.3% live, against 21.2% for Gemini Flash and 24.6% for Chirp 3.

Read the full accuracy tables
Accuracy

Addis Scribe and Google on three Hausa test sets

Word error rate and character error rate on each set, for every mode. Every system transcribed the same clips.

WAXAL Hausa

197 test clips, word error rate, lower is better

0%10%20%30%40%Gemini Flash (latest)Gemini Flash (latest): 22.2%22.2%Addis Scribe (live)Addis Scribe (live): 22.5%22.5%Addis Scribe (upload)Addis Scribe (upload): 23.4%23.4%Google Chirp 3 (batch)Google Chirp 3 (batch): 60.9%60.9%Word error rate
Addis ScribeGoogle

FLEURS Hausa

621 test clips, word error rate, lower is better

0%10%20%30%Google Chirp 3 (batch)Google Chirp 3 (batch): 19.5%19.5%Addis Scribe (live)Addis Scribe (live): 24.2%24.2%Addis Scribe (upload)Addis Scribe (upload): 26.0%26.0%Gemini Flash (latest)Gemini Flash (latest): 26.3%26.3%Word error rate
Addis ScribeGoogle

Common Voice Hausa

829 clips, word error rate, lower is better

0%10%20%30%Addis Scribe (upload)Addis Scribe (upload): 17.2%17.2%Addis Scribe (live)Addis Scribe (live): 17.3%17.3%Gemini Flash (latest)Gemini Flash (latest): 21.2%21.2%Google Chirp 3 (batch)Google Chirp 3 (batch): 24.6%24.6%Word error rate
Addis ScribeGoogle

Every system and mode

SystemModeWAXALFLEURSCommon Voice
WERCERWERCERWERCER
Addis Scribe HausaLive, 1.12 s chunks22.5%8.5%24.2%9.3%17.3%4.3%
Addis Scribe HausaLive, 0.32 s chunks22.8%8.5%n/an/an/an/a
Addis Scribe HausaWhole file23.4%8.5%26.0%10.6%17.2%4.3%
Google Gemini Flash (latest)Whole file22.2%8.1%26.3%14.2%21.2%5.7%
Google Chirp 3Batch60.9%53.6%19.5%6.2%24.6%20.2%

Bold marks the best value in each column. The WAXAL chart cuts the Chirp 3 bar at 40%; its value is in the table. Addis Scribe with 0.32 s chunks was scored on WAXAL only.

Method

What was tested, and how each handles live audio

Addis Scribe streams live audio. The other systems were given the whole recording, so they are scored for accuracy only.

SystemLive audioHow it was run
Addis Scribe HausaNative streamingStreams in 0.32 s or 1.12 s chunks through the Addis Scribe API, so text appears while people speak.
Google Gemini Flash (latest)Offline onlyGiven the whole clip with a transcription prompt. No live mode, so scored for accuracy.
Google Chirp 3Native (cloud API)Google Cloud speech recognition, tested as a batch request on the whole clip.
Method

Test sets and scoring rules

The test sets are public. None of these test clips were used to train Addis Scribe.

Test setWhere to find itClipsWhat it measures
WAXALgoogle/WaxalNLPHausa test split, all 197 clipsHausa speech with human transcripts
FLEURSgoogle/fleursha_ng test split, all 621 clipsRead sentences with human transcripts
Common VoiceMozilla Common VoiceHausa, 829 clipsRead sentences recorded by volunteers

Scoring

Every system on a set is scored with the same scorer and text normaliser, against the same human transcripts. WER is word error rate and CER is character error rate, both lower is better.

Limitations

What this run does not show

  • Each set measures something different, and the ranking changes from set to set. No single number here says which system is best for your audio.
  • This page compares Addis Scribe with Google Gemini Flash and Google Chirp 3 only.
  • This page reports accuracy only. Live latency was not measured for Hausa.
  • Unlike the Amharic and Afaan Oromo runs, the per-clip transcripts for this run are not in the public benchmark folder yet.

Transcribe Hausa with the API

Add language=ha to a Scribe upload, live session or long-file job. Uploads, live streaming, word timestamps, captions and speaker labels all work in Hausa, at the same per-character price as Amharic. Hausa text comes back in lowercase without punctuation, with the Hausa letters ɓ, ɗ and ƙ.